« Cartoon controversy reflects deeper Danish problem | Main | Bethlehem Christians fearful of a Hamas future »

February 04, 2006

Jordanian editor: 'Cartoons silly,' time to move on

By Joanna Chen

The furor over a Danish newspaper's publication of provocative caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad continues to spread across Europe and the Mideast. On Thursday, further outrage was triggered throughout the Muslim world when the Jordanian weekly Shihan republished the caricatures seen by many as a crude affront to Islam. The Jordanian government and press association swiftly condemned the publication and Shihan's editor in chief, Jihad Momani, was fired. On Saturday, Momani was arrested for violations of Jordan's press law, which forbids insults against religion. Before that arrest, NEWSWEEK's Joanna Chen spoke to Momani by phone about the ongoing public outcry. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: Did you expect that publishing the offending caricatures would cause such an outcry in Jordan?

Jihad Momani: I was shocked and surprised to hear the statements released by the Jordanian government condemning my decision to publish the cartoons. And it's continuing. Today there have been more demonstrations.

Source: [Newsweek]

It's not the first time caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad have been published. Why are they causing so much controversy now?

I think there is a political motive behind the Muslim uprisings. Why are the voices protesting these cartoons so very loud? We are talking here about countries that have taken the step of supporting the uprising and encouraging boycotts.

You're suggesting that people are looking for an excuse to complain about the West.

Well, I think it's true to say we're talking about a new era between Islam and the West. The two sides are trying to rebuild their relations. They are trying to approach the relationship in a different way, to go back to the ‘80s or early ‘90s of the golden age between Americans, between the Western world, and Islam in general. So now, in opposition we are hearing loud voices protesting against these cartoons. The Americans are working through back channels. They're holding negotiations with Islamic groups in the Middle East. This is good. Now we are looking at the amazing victory of Hamas in Palestine and it's clear the [United States] will not just sit back and observe. They will go forward, maybe they will talk to Hamas, accept Hamas.

Don't you think that by publishing the caricatures you were just fanning the flames of hatred?

No, not at all. I was trying to calm them down, to tell them these cartoons are not the end of the world, that insults have happened before and will happen again. The cartoons are silly. They don't deserve such an intense reaction.

Does the world lack a sense of humor?
Religion is a red line. No religion should be laughed at. But you have to know how to respond [appropriately].

Is there more prejudice today against the Muslim community in general?
Yes, and I think it will increase even more because of the reaction to these silly cartoons. We're seeing more discrimination against Muslims throughout the world.

What do you think the answer is?

Talking to each other face to face and resolving our problems frankly. What we are seeing here is a conflict between civilizations, West and East. We must put an end to this struggle because it simply isn't good for our future. We have to rebuild these relations and to do something positive to stop what is going on. And we have to start at home.

What should the Muslim world do?

We must forgive. We're talking about a foreign newspaper in Denmark, far away from the Muslim world. Maybe they didn't know they were doing something wrong and either way, they have apologized and the Muslim world must accept it. I'm not empathizing with them, I don't agree with them but we can't just go that far with our punishment. I feel we, the Muslims, are overreacting.

I didn't publish the cartoons because I support them. My position is to show our leaders how silly they are and how they insulted the Prophet Muhammad. They show him as a terrorist and I'm against this. We must respect not just Muhammad but all religions.

So what is the point of these protests?

They are receiving worldwide support. They say they want an apology but I think they're seeking not just an apology but more understanding towards Islam. Let us rebuild the bridges between our two worlds.

Do you think freedom of speech is being curtailed in the Muslim world?

No, in the mosques here they have the freedom to talk about this issue, so we have freedom of speech. But I'm waiting for our national media to listen to me as they listen to the other side.

Do you think the recent riots in France were a precursor to this public outcry?

It's more like a continuation. Tomorrow we'll witness demonstrations against Jews, or Christians. That will be the next step and it will be dangerous.

If you could turn back the clock, what would you do?

I wouldn't publish the cartoons. I feel I haven't done anything wrong but I wouldn't do this again. I believe in freedom of the press and I have always fought for it. But what I wanted to do was to show the people exactly what they were protesting against. When I looked at these images, I just saw silly cartoons without any meaning.

Related stories:

For single page combination of all stories on the Danish cartoon row click here

Posted at 03:37 PM in Cartoon rows, Media Watch, Religion | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc76c53ef00d83425b67553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jordanian editor: 'Cartoons silly,' time to move on:

» Cartoons, Controversy and Protests from Opinionated Voice
Remi Kanazi writes; Picture this: A cartoon of Jesus, with his pants down, smiling, raping a little boy. The caption above it reads “Got Catholicism?” Or how about a picture of a Rabbi with blood dripping from his mouth after bludgeoning a ... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 4, 2006 8:49:57 PM

Comments

Intresting article here. It is time to move on.

Posted by: jamal | Feb 4, 2006 8:47:13 PM

Seems a little extreme, the uproar over the cartoons. I have looked at the images of muslims, angered over the publication of the cartoons.

I am upset over the violent images; seems as though people are looking for an excuse to vent. Property is being damaged, people are losing jobs (managing editor of French newpaper) over this foolishness. Now everywhere folks will be looking for potentially offensive cartoons. These are not positive images of muslims. Although, I pray that I have never offened anyone so deeply that they contemplated violence and property damage, also I would not want to have a friend or associate so easily angered.

Posted by: senyah | Feb 4, 2006 9:18:10 PM

Re: Cartoons about Jesus
I know who Jesus is, and what he did for me. A cartoon cannot change that. However, if one can take account of the images of religious types that are portrayed in the media, I can understand and validate causes for offense, but violence, vandelism, I cannot excuse.

Posted by: senyah | Feb 4, 2006 9:31:26 PM

everyone just don't get it.
And it seems Momani don't get the whole idea as well.

The Prophet (s.a.w) is someone we love more than ourselves, more than our family or spouse. He is second only to Allah s.w.t!!!

Of course we are angry when our most beloved Prophet (s.a.w) is being insulted.

How does one feel when a boy/girlfriend if not a spouse is insulted or humiliated?

I am against violent reactions, and i am against drawing back caricatures of prominent figures/idols because it is against Islam to insult another religion publicly, so as to prevent a "ping-pong" game of insults.

But I am all for the peaceful protests and boycotts.

Posted by: yunir | Feb 6, 2006 8:01:18 AM

As I am for your right to peacefully object to the cartoons I hope you also acknowledge the cartoonists right to draw them and the newspapers right to publish them. Although they may be considered tasteless there is no justification for violence.

Posted by: oo0o0 | Feb 6, 2006 8:29:19 AM

If i am for the peaceful protests.....
doesn't it mean im against the newspapers actions?
heheh

anyway... so...
even if i disaprove, i shld just keep quite? because it is their right to publish?

why then, do we hear artists filing lawsuits against media for publishing blasphemous reports?

Hitler came into power because the (good) people around him did nothing.

The new state of Isreal filed lawsuits against Switzerland because it didn't go to war aginst Nazis. Where was Swtitzerland's right in not having to go against the Nazis?

Legally, Switzerland was not contractually obliged to side any country.

If disapproval means keeping quite...
(i dunno... u guys think carefully about this)

hmmm.. gives me an idea...

i should start a local tabloid that spreads hot gossips, wild rumors, lies, outrages slander...
anything that incites racial hatred, tht kinda stuff would definitely be a sell out on almost all issues.....

and if i get sued...

p.s: my email is always open.....

Posted by: yunir | Feb 7, 2006 4:57:02 AM

I think if the majority of muslim's were educated in schools rather then mosques there view on personal freedom's and right's would reflect their own personal views and not those of religious leaders/zealots.

"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it." Voltaire

Posted by: Hectic influeence | Feb 7, 2006 6:55:36 PM

Post a comment