« Palestinians storm EU Gaza office over Dane cartoons | Main | New video released of hostage Jill Carroll »
January 30, 2006
Danish Cartoons: Making a mountain out of a molehill
By Mona Eltahawy
Can we finally admit that Muslims have blown out of all proportion their outrage over 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammad published in a Danish newspaper last September? In the latest twist, both the Organization for the Islamic Conference and the Gulf Cooperation Council condemned a Norwegian newspaper for reprinting the drawings -- a decision the publication defended as protecting freedom of expression.
Saudi Arabia recalled its ambassador from Denmark for "consultations" and Iraqis called in sermons and demonstrations for an investigation into the Danish and Norwegian publications that published the cartoons. The initial printing of the cartoons in Denmark led to death threats being issued against the artists, demonstrations in Kashmir, and condemnation from 11 countries. What did any of this achieve but prove the original point of the newspaper's culture editor, that artists in Europe were censoring themselves because they feared Muslim reaction? He commissioned the cartoons after hearing that Danish artists were too scared to illustrate a children's book about the prophet.
While one cartoon was particularly offensive because it showed the prophet as wearing a turban with a bomb attached to it, a great deal of the anger had to do with the mere depiction of the prophet. Muslims seem to forget that just because they are prohibited from representing the prophet in any way, this does not apply to everybody else.
Source: [Muslim Wake Up]
Even with regards to the egregious cartoon showing the prophet with a bomb, Muslim reaction was exaggerated. This should have remained an internal Danish issue. Muslim groups in Denmark have been pursuing a legal course and have vowed to appeal a prosecutor's refusal to file charges against the newspaper.
Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen was right not to intervene, insisting the government has no say over media - the argument used by Arab leaders when they are asked about anti-Semitism in their media, by the way. But in a New Year's speech, Rasmussen condemned "any expression, action or indication that attempts to demonize groups of people on the basis of their religion or ethnic background."
What should have remained a local issue turned into a diplomatic uproar that Muslims otherwise rarely provoke when fighting for their rights around the world. Perhaps the Muslim governments who spearheaded the campaign - led by Egypt - felt this was an easy way to burnish their Islamic credentials at a time when domestic Islamists are stronger than they have been in many years.
Must we really boycott Danish products, as one e-mail I received exhorted? And why did an audience member at December's Arab Thought Foundation conference in Dubai insist on delivering a lecture on the Danish cartoons, instead of focusing on the topic of the panel, namely Arab media and terrorism? Of all the issues that plague the Muslim world today, are our priorities cartoons published in a newspaper in a country inhabited by less than 6 million people?
If we really want to pick a fight with the West, have we forgotten that 500 Muslim men continue to be detained without charge at the makeshift prison run by the United States at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which last week marked its fourth anniversary?
The fracas over the cartoons is a sad testament to the impotence of the Muslim world. That clerics and leaders of Muslim countries gain any sense of power over this issue is a reminder of how powerless they really are and also a reminder, as if we needed one, of the moral bankruptcy of our self-appointed moral guides. It is no wonder that these same moral guides have gone on a power trip over cartoons – after all, clerics in Egypt have been arguing over whether married couples can be naked during sex.
In the midst of they hysteria over the cartoons, here are a few facts we should remember. However offensive any of the 12 cartoons were, they did not incite violence against Muslims. For an example of incitement, though, one must go back a few weeks before the cartoons were published.
In August, the Danish authorities withdrew for three months the broadcasting license of a Copenhagen radio station after it called for the extermination of Muslims. Those were real threats and the government protected Muslims -- the same government later condemned for not punishing the newspaper that published the cartoons.
Second, the cartoon incident belongs at the very center of the kind of debate that Muslims must have in the European countries where they live -- particularly after the Madrid train bombings of 2003 and the London subway bombings of 2005. While right-wing anti-immigration groups whip up Islamophobia in Denmark, Muslim communities wallow in denial over the increasing role of their own extremists.
As just one example, last August Fadi Abdullatif, the spokesman for the Danish branch of the militant Hizb-ut-Tahrir organization, was charged with calling for the killing of members of the Danish government. He distributed leaflets calling on Muslims in Denmark to go to Fallujah in Iraq and fight the Americans, and to kill their own leaders if they obstructed them. Police in Denmark have been on alert since the London bombings, after which at least three extremist Web sites warned that Denmark could be the next target. There are 500 Danish troops working alongside American and British troops in Iraq.
Not only does Hizb-ut-Tahrir, an organization banned in many Muslim countries, have a branch in Denmark, but Abdullatif has a history of calling for violence that he then justifies by referring to freedom of speech - the very notion the Danish newspaper made use of to publish the cartoons. In October 2002, Abdullatif was found guilty of distributing racist propaganda after Hizb-ut-Tahrir handed out leaflets that made threats against Jews by citing verses from the Koran. He was given a 60-day suspended sentence.
Abdullatif used the Koran to justify incitement to violence! And we still wonder why people associate Islam with violence?
Muslims must honestly examine why there is such a huge gap between the way we imagine Islam and our prophet, and the way both are seen by others. Our offended sensibilities must not be limited to the Danish newspaper or the cartoonist, but to those like Fadi Abdullatif whose actions should be regarded as just as offensive to Islam and to our reverence for the prophet. Otherwise, we are all responsible for those Danish cartoons.
This article is based on a column initially published in English in Lebanon's The Daily Star and in Arabic in Egypt's al-Dostour.
Related stories:
For single page combination of all stories on the Danish cartoon row click here
- Row deepens over Danish cartoons of Prophet
- Norwegian magazine prints Prophet caricatures
- Saudi cleric wants Danish paper punished for cartoons
- Danish goods boycott begins over Prophet caricature
- Jordan foreign ministry summons Danish consul
- Saudis recall envoy in row over Danish cartoons
- Libya shuttering embassy in Denmark over cartoons
- Palestinians storm EU Gaza office over Dane cartoons
- Islamic fury grows over Danish caricatures
- Norway apologizes over Prophet caricatures
- Danish paper issues apology for Prophet cartoons
- French paper reprints Denmark's Prophet caricatures
- Newspapers across Europe reprint Prophet cartoons
- Gaza gunmen close EU office over Prophet cartoons
- Editor fired after publication of Prophet caricatures
- Hezbollah: Rushdie death would stop Prophet insults
- Jordanian paper reprints Danish Prophet cartoons
- French editor of 'Soir' fired over Prophet cartoons
- Jordan editor fired for Prophet cartoon reprint
- BBC, ITV show cartoons; Muslims vent outrage
- Syrians set Danish, Norweigan embassies ablaze
- Boycott over Danish cartoons costing Arla £1m daily
- Cartoon controversy reflects deeper Danish problem
- Jordanian editor: 'Cartoons silly,' time to move on
- Prophet cartoon protests leave 4 dead in Afghanistan
- Iran becomes new focus of Prophet cartoon protests
- Two editors in court in Jordan over Prophet cartoons
- Iraq Christians edgy as Prophet cartoon row escalates
- U.S. Muslims react with tempered anger over cartoons
Posted at 12:26 PM in Cartoon rows, Commentary, Religion | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc76c53ef00d834a5e73a69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Danish Cartoons: Making a mountain out of a molehill:
Comments
Freedom of press does not mean to insult other if in any europein country one speaks badely about gays and lesbian that will be regarded as disrespect. But speaking about our beloved prophet is freedom of press !!!!!. may almighty Allah teach them what to respect and what not to respect. we should not for their apology as it does not mean anything with what they have done
Posted by: Hussien | Jan 30, 2006 1:52:12 PM
Moron. Please get a little western *experience* before you make false claims.
Gays and Lesbians are insulted in the media ALL the time. Less so now than before.
Posted by: The Pagan Lord | Jan 30, 2006 5:24:45 PM
This article by Mona Eltahawy really expresses quite well how I feel about this issue.
You muslims put too much faith into your fellow muslims words. They are not all that honest to you as you may think. Ask questions. Be doubtful. Seek the truth in such a matter before you threaten people with death and killing. Part of seeking the truth is to discuss the issue. If you skip that part you are not interrested in the truth and are basically here to encourage others to do your bidding (namely attack your target with whatever means necessary). That is very manipulative and not at all honest behaviour. Think about it for a change. Not just react with your feelings as they more often than not are too extreme. Sleep on it is usually a good tactic ;-)
Posted by: some Dane | Jan 30, 2006 8:35:38 PM
Reading history I think religions had caused so many wars, deaths and sufferings to man on this earth. Examples were the the killing of heathens and non-believers, Reformation War, Crusades, Spanish Inquisition etc.
Millions were killed in the name of religion & God
If you were born then, you would kill each other on the instruction of the religious leaders who claimed God gave them the instruction.
Now we know it is wrong. Therefore we must NOT believe everything religious leaders say.
Religions & its leaders only claimed they are the SOLE AGENTS to God. There is NO WAY you can confirm that with God.
Does God wants people to kill each other over HIM?
If you believe in GOD it is better you pray to HIM DIRECTLY whenever you are ready, in any convenient place, in any direction, in any language etc. GOD will be able to hear you because God is almighty, omniscient, all knowing and immanent and smart.
You will be doing the right thing if you pray to GOD directly because GOD did not tell us whom HE appointed as the SOLE AGENT.
If you pray to GOD DIRECTLY you will praying to HIM in unison and unity. There will be less conflict.
If you pray to GOD directly you don't have to pay tithes.
God don't need money from man.
If God needs money from man then FED Chief can print USD for GOD and he will be more powerful than God.
Religions are bound to go on collision course because they fight for spheres of influence & their beliefs clashed.
The Christians believed Jesus is the SON OF GOD.
The Muslims said Jesus is NOT Son of God but a prophet.
The Christians hit back and criticised the Prophet.
There is a WAR in the INTERNET bet Christians & Muslims.
So forget about religion.
Religions had sapped alot of our resources, energy and time. See the number of churches, mosques, temples etc built all over the world.
All these resources can be used to feed the hungry, help the needful, educate and immunise the people.
Religions are full of rituals and rules.
Religious leaders want to dominate, police and colonize its followers.
Religion want to control our lives & they want to trap our minds.
Religion is a form of slavery.
A religion must NOT ostracise or discriminate those from other religions or those who are atheists, agnostics.
Therefore it is so important to separate the State from religion.
If a state is religionised it will ostracise those from other religions/atheists etc or use subtle pressure to force convert others.
The Chinese Emperor claimed that HE ruled with the mandate from Heaven & descendent of GOD.
This was NOT negotiable and the people could NOT question his authority and his origin.
This was the same with the Japanese Emperor who was considered to be the descendent of the SUN God.
Incas sacrificed young girls to their God.
Does God want sacrifice?
So often religious leaders claimed they can read God's mind or knows what God wants. Such leaders who can read God's mind have to be greater than GOD.
Religions will still remain for a long time because those who benefit from religion will never give up. Majority are just followers. Just imagine about 2 billion people live with less than US$1 a day. Most of them are under-nourished. Most do not go to school and cannot read. Survival is so difficult let alone read and think and rationalize about religion.
Scriptures are thick & difficult to fathom unless you can read with a mature mind at 40.
If I have written anything wrong please correct me. I will be most grateful.
HC CHAN
Posted by: HC CHAN | Jan 31, 2006 4:06:17 AM
great post HC...i couldn't agree with you more and it's true what you say about religion, especially how much religions stir up the masses into mass insanity. methinks that religion is created by man, not god and as you say god is everywhere all the time and why waste energy time and money on sunday, saturday, xmass, ramadan, etc....thank your higher being in private and don't bother me please!!!
Posted by: gudheartedguy | Jan 31, 2006 6:07:28 AM
Any opinion that needs to bunch all people of one religion together to make its point is prejudiced. Using examples of extremist to color a whole religion bad is not the right way to have a meaninfull discussion.
Maybe you are not trying to do that, but are just peaching for your own flock to get yourself a sense of importance. Luckily not everybody is like you, your country would be a dictatorship before you could say 'freedom of speech'. But I grant you, yours would be a christian dictatorship, so you'll still have youw own religion. Nevermind that there are more people going to the mosk then there are pleople going to church in europe...
That was what I wanted to say. I'll pray for Allah to give you better sense before you write your next piece.
Salam.
Posted by: Muhammed | Jan 31, 2006 6:20:21 AM
PLEASE DON'T PRAY TO ALLAH FOR ME, MUHAMMED....you seemed to miss the whole point of the last two posts.....we don't need your islam god, your christian god, your jew god, your astec god or ANY GOD!! JUST LEAVE US ALONE WITH YOUR GODS AND LET US DEAL WITH OUR OWN GODS IN PRIVACY!! WHERE RELIGION BELONGS, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS...AND NOT SHOVED INTO OTHER'S FACES.
PEACE, IS WHAT MY GOD WANTS, NOT WAR AND HATRED!!
Posted by: gudheartedguy | Jan 31, 2006 7:53:58 AM
This whole mess is totally rediculous and has indeed made a mountain out of a molehill. it strikes me as ironic and hypocritical that both of the religions that seem to be the hotbed of hate...islam and jews both seem to be the most defensive of their beliefs. maybe because they both are insecure about their GODS!!!
MY GOD SAYS 'MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR!!'
Posted by: gudheartedguy | Jan 31, 2006 8:04:29 AM
peace be to you
It is true that the West cherishes freedom of expression. However it is a bit selective if denial of the Holocaust (I do not deny it, but do those who deny it have the freedom to do so) is a crime. It is also a bit more selective when calling Muslims to expel the invaders from territories occupied by the Zionists and US imperialists is a crime (called hate speech and terrorism). It is also a bit selective when a democracy elects Hamas, and the West goes berserk about it.
In my opinion the Danes, being largely non-Muslim, living in a non-Islamic country, do not have to bow to our feelings. At the same time, we Muslims also believe in the freedom of choice of buying or not buying products from nations that has no respect for our views on the subject of the prophet. Similarly for selling or not selling our products to said nations. Similarly for other types of interaction with said nations.
Fair enough!
Posted by: timbuktu | Jan 31, 2006 8:36:53 AM
Why have the caricatures in the first place? Is it not meant to cause trouble and hurt. It is because of the evil in their hearts that these caricatures come about. Search within yourselves everyone, whether you are a Muslim or non-Muslim. The things that you do, every step and action taken, are all for what purpose? An ounce of evil will be recorded nonetheless. Definitely we are hurt by these unfounded caricatures and we will leave it to God for their evil deeds.
Anuar bin Kassim
Singapore
Posted by: Anuar bin Kassim | Jan 31, 2006 8:40:15 AM
Well, gudheartedguy, maybe YOUR God can escort you out of here to another topic since this one involves those who believe in values and religion. The question of whether religion is 'man-created'or not is, thus, not the issue of concern here.. So unless you've got something relevant to add here, you can go worship your love- making God elsewhere...
Anyways, regarding this article, I see it as nothing but a group of lame claims written by someone who has no idea of what's really happening... Prophet Muhammed should not be represented in any graphical depiction. Bottom line. That's what Muslims believe in and expect non- Muslims to respect. Otherwise, one will witness caricatures mocking prophets, messengers and religions on a daily basis in magazines and periodicals around the world. Muslims don't go around making fun of Jesus or Moses and so its only normal to expect the same towards Mohammed.
And don't you say the Muslim reaction is exaggerated. I peronally believe that the depiction of a Prophet with a bomb on his head is enough to trigger a third world war. You claim you uphold freedom, promote democracy and condemn injustice. You have granted your people their rights, and brag about the freedom of expression. But what is such freedom that allows an individual to humiliate another religion; another civilization. How uncivilized can you be, how low can you get, when you have no moral barriers that prohibit you from attacking others’ beliefs and ideologies?
What amazes me is the state of shock you experience whenever you witness a so- called terrorist attack. You provoke Muslims, disrespect their prophet and demean their ideals and expect them to remain silent as they watch their religion being attacked ?!
Bottom Line. As long as Muslims are being exposed to humiliation and global dishonor, these attacks will continue, and more ‘Usama Bin Ladens’ will appear.
Posted by: B.E.E.S.Y | Jan 31, 2006 9:35:30 AM
BEESY, haven't you ALREADY noticed articles, films, the arts disrespecting Christianity? We make a fuss, we write letters, we boycott...but Jesus ultimately called us to love those who hate us and pray for those who persecute us. then we can forgive, cease bitterness and let God Almighty deal the big job of protecting His name.
CH Chan and gudhearted guy, I am so sorry that there has not been one believer in Jesus Christ in your lives that has influenced you positively for our faith.That to me, is a greater scandel than all the desecrations of His image - that His image bearers have failed to do so in your lives.
I am going to pray that one follower of Christ will be a part of bringing good into your lives this week, and perhaps one who has wronged you will apologize.
Posted by: kinzi | Jan 31, 2006 11:01:10 AM
Dear HC Chan,
I agree with you that all wars seemed to be initiated for religious reasons, but they were not!. Mostly people who are seeking war are using religious reasons to start one, while they are too far from their own religions. I happen to know some of what Moses, Jesus and Mohammed directions and all of them are encouraging living in peace. (This is my opinion only)
I wanted to say more but I ran out of time.. :)
God bless us all with light to his way.
Posted by: Walid Mohammed | Feb 1, 2006 6:14:33 AM
Mohammed has been portrayed for centuries, why did it go wrong this time?
Is it because someone has an interest in escalating the growing friction between the west and the Arab world?
I live in Denmark, and yes we do have extremists here too. People who think there has been too much immigration the last ten years. But most people here have no grudge against other religions, have no interest in creating a conflict or even try to humiliate other cultural groups.
The newspaper did not publish the pictures to insult Muslims, but to make a point. Should we fear for our lives because of what we say, write or draw?
We have along tradition of editorial cartoons in our press and media, and we are very fond of our freedom of speech. Freedom of speech comes with a responsibility; anyone who feels hurt or insulted can take the newspaper to court.
The question is, why has 12 drawings in a small newspaper in a small country stirred up so much trouble? The newspaper is in Danish which only 5 million people understand. Only 10 percent of those read it. It was intended for the Danish public, and not the rest of the world.
Will the Muslim world boycott France now the French press have published the pictures also?
If I have a choice, I would choose to live in a country where my feelings might get hurt but where I also have the right to answer back without fearing for my life.
I too am sorry that the drawings have hurt so many people.
Regards
Kogge
Posted by: John | Feb 1, 2006 8:59:31 AM
All this shows that Muslims are yet far beyond the borders of wisdom. I live in Iran myself, and officially I’m considered a Muslim. I can’t find out what’s the wrong with drawing a cartoon of Muhammad, or those other considered-hollies. I’ve read and heard this many times these days that “Freedom of press/speaking/etc. doesn’t mean to insult others’ believes”
Well, the fact is that if someone’s believes are in the form to be simply insulted, that’s his or her own problem.
I don’t think that Arabs will differ much during the following decades, or even centuries, just hope that Iranians cut these pre-wisdom believes ;)
Posted by: Lord Sharlune | Feb 1, 2006 11:17:44 AM
همه باید به عقاید یکدیگر احترام بگزارند
Posted by: امیر | Feb 1, 2006 2:48:26 PM
Isnt it strange that the Muslim world demands westerners show respect for their religion, yet they have no hesitation in showing disrespect for others, be it flag burning, issuing fatwas for people who speak their mind, etc.
Personally I am not sorry at all that people have been offended; it is about time they faced up to the fact that it is perfectly legitimate for people to have different views to their own.
Posted by: Utchie | Feb 1, 2006 4:15:13 PM
B.E.E.S.Y might like to read this article
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/287
Posted by: G0d | Feb 1, 2006 4:41:30 PM
So here we stand after 1400 years and still muslim and christian can't goe along.I guess the gifts of western secular progressive mentality the we inherited from the Greek civilization hasn't made a mark on those poor backward souls of Islam.
Jose/Spain
Posted by: Jose | Feb 2, 2006 1:02:15 AM
whatever, whoever, whereever.... one never, never poke fun at religion, be it Christianity, Bhudism, Taoism, Hindhi. Only satan does it.
Posted by: Yap Henry | Feb 2, 2006 8:59:31 AM
Regardless of any reliegon, it is basic manners not to poke fun or ridicule any other persons beliefs or ways of thinking but to befriend them and in that friendship show true beliefs and the straight path. It is not that islam and any other reliegon cant get along. it is narrow minded people with a desire of power and control alone that have personality conflicts with each other. this happens regardless of reliegon. Also humans being themselves feel offended in any sense when they are being made fun of. me being a muslim was offended that some one would make fun of a figure i would consider my role model. had ur role model been jesus or moses and i personally didnt like neither one of them (which i do) does is it give me the right do depicte both those men in a shameful disgraceful manner????
You do not have to be part of a reliegon to feel offended when abuse is 'thrown' at someone you love, you just merely have to be sane.
Posted by: Omar | Feb 2, 2006 11:15:30 AM
ps last post may came across that i do not like jesus or moses, which is wrong, i DO infact like both those men, and respect them greatly.
Posted by: omar | Feb 2, 2006 11:22:44 AM
Omar, you talk about basic manners, and not offending.
How do you think Danish people feel when because of the actions of one newspaper company, the entire Danish people are threatened physically & verbally by the Muslim world. Their national flag is burned and stamped on.
Are these the basic manners you as a Muslim are trying to promote? Interesting...
I wonder how you would feel if I started burning your flag, or lets say I start burning the Koran.
The Muslim world is often hypocritical and this really must change if you expect non-Muslims to respect your beliefs.
Posted by: G0d | Feb 2, 2006 12:40:03 PM
respect each other religion stop.we are all passengers in this world stop.
Posted by: life lover | Feb 2, 2006 1:36:59 PM
Poor Omar! Someone has already been offended by your observation that much of the world's troubles are owing to power-hungry individuals/groups and the fact that simple common courtesy and basic respect for others has been abandoned by a seeming majority of humans in the world.
When even the most benign observation is capable of being misinterpreted and coming under attack, it's little wonder we can't get along with our next door neighbors, let alone the rest of the world. And we wonder why we're in the shape we are in! I expect some folks can find an insult in the words "good morning."
Posted by: Eyetest | Feb 2, 2006 1:43:12 PM
